Blog · Running outreach at scale
Why your LinkedIn accounts send less than you think
Healthy accounts go quiet too, and nothing tells you.
Upscale Outreach ·
Because most of the shortfall happens on healthy accounts. In real campaigns, accounts sent 74% of the volume they were set up for, and in 69% of short weeks nothing had stopped them: no cooldown, no block, no lapsed subscription.
Outscale benchmarks, from 112,991 prospects reached in real campaigns.
A quarter of the volume never went out
Every account here had a weekly target: 200 connection requests with Sales Navigator, 100 without, less while a new account warms up. Across real campaigns, accounts sent 74% of it.
- Three-quarters of target or more59%
- Half to three-quarters18%
- Under half23%
41% of account-weeks came in under three-quarters of target. Not one account with a month or more of history hit its target every week, and 40% were short at least every other week.
Short weeks come in runs
A short week is rarely alone. 64% of runs of short weeks lasted two weeks or more, and 36% lasted three or more. By the time anybody notices, a fortnight of volume has gone, and it doesn’t come back.
Most of the time, nothing stopped them
The usual suspects are LinkedIn’s: a cooldown, a login that needs checking, a lapsed Sales Navigator licence. We record all three, every day. In the weeks we could see, 31% of short weeks had any of them. Weeks that hit target had them 30% of the time.
So in 69% of short weeks the account was healthy all week, and still sent a median 43% of its target. Nothing on record stopped it. That leaves the dull causes nobody gets an alert for: a campaign that ran out of people, a pause nobody lifted, a daily limit set low.
Why nobody notices
A restriction is loud: an email, a red banner, a worried message from the account’s owner. A quiet account is just quiet. The sending tool shows what went out, never what didn’t, so a week at 43% of target looks like any other week.
And everyone assumes the machine is on it. You set the limits, you loaded the leads, the tool sends. Checking feels like babysitting software.
What to do today
- Check sends against target, per account, every week. Campaign totals hide a quiet account behind a busy one.
- Look at the healthy short weeks first. They’re the common ones: check the queue, the pauses and the daily limits.
- Catch the second week. One short week is a blip. Two in a row is a run, and runs are where the volume goes.
More in running outreach at scale
Where LinkedIn outreach leaks
None of the leaks is dramatic. Together they’re the difference.
In small places, all at once. In real campaigns, accounts sent 74% of the volume they were set up for, and 42% of the replies worth answering never got a message back. Put just those two together and fewer than half the conversations a campaign was built for get a real chance.
Read itHeyReach vs Skylead: does the tool change your LinkedIn results?
Prospects can’t tell the difference. Your volume can.
Not for your prospects. The same person sending into the same country was accepted at the same rate on HeyReach and Skylead, and replies came out even. What changed was volume: Skylead sent more of its target in May and June, HeyReach from July. And how many replies got answered came down to who watched the inbox.
Read itHow to coach a sales team on LinkedIn replies
Coach the ask.
Coach the ask. The inboxes that proposed a call most often booked 2.6 times as many of their conversations as the inboxes that asked least. Ranked by speed, there was no pattern at all.
Read itHow many LinkedIn replies go unanswered?
The reply arrived. Nobody was home.
42% of the LinkedIn replies worth answering never got a single message back, including 28% of the people who said they were interested. Quiet inboxes dropped more of them than busy ones.
Read it